section p: expectations (respondent)
==========================================================================================
hrs 2016 final release
note to users: this codebook is designed to match the distribution dataset.
codebook metadata are derived from the data collection instrument.
if you have questions concerning codebook layout or content please bring
them to the attention of the hrs staff at hrsquestions@umich.edu.
printing recommendation: set margins (left/right/top/bottom) to .5 inch; print
in portrait orientation using a mono-space 10-point font.
==========================================================================================
hhid household identification number
section: p level: respondent type: character width: 6 decimals: 0
.................................................................................
20912 010001-959738. household identification number
n respondent person identification number
section: p level: respondent type: character width: 3 decimals: 0
.................................................................................
11991 010. person identifier
696 011. person identifier
33 012. person identifier
1 013. person identifier
6697 020. person identifier
214 021. person identifier
18 022. person identifier
1 023. person identifier
432 030. person identifier
47 031. person identifier
4 032. person identifier
1 033. person identifier
719 040. person identifier
51 041. person identifier
6 042. person identifier
1 043. person identifier
subhh 2016 sub household identification number
section: p level: respondent type: character width: 1 decimals: 0
.................................................................................
19158 0. original sample household - no split from divorce or
separation of spouses or partners
869 1. split household - one half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
691 2. split household - one half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
66 5. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
7 6. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
120 7. reunited household - respondents from split household
reunite
1 8. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
osubhh 2014 sub household identification number
section: p level: respondent type: character width: 1 decimals: 0
.................................................................................
14933 0. original sample household - no split from divorce or
separation of spouses or partners
773 1. split household - one half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
627 2. split household - one half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
55 5. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
6 6. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
99 7. reunited household - respondents from split household
reunite
1 8. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
4418 blank. new cohort hh
pn_sp 2016 spouse/partner person number
section: p level: respondent type: character width: 3 decimals: 0
.................................................................................
5750 010. person identifier
503 011. person identifier
27 012. person identifier
1 013. person identifier
5435 020. person identifier
175 021. person identifier
14 022. person identifier
1 023. person identifier
255 030. person identifier
29 031. person identifier
1 032. person identifier
1 033. person identifier
454 040. person identifier
38 041. person identifier
3 042. person identifier
2 043. person identifier
8 810. spouse of original r, never entered sample
36 811. spouse of non-original respondent
3 812. spouse of non-original respondent
6 821. spouse of non-original respondent
2 822. spouse of non-original respondent
3 831. spouse of non-original respondent
2 832. spouse of non-original respondent
4 841. spouse of non-original respondent
8159 blank. single respondent household
csr 2016 whether coversheet respondent
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
.................................................................................
15018 1. yes
55 3. 2nd coverscreen r, answers not retained
5839 5. no
famr 2016 whether family respondent
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
.................................................................................
14561 1. family r
25 3. 2nd family r, answers not retained
6326 5. non-family r
finr 2016 whether financial respondent
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
.................................................................................
14766 1. financial r
25 3. 2nd financial r, answers not retained
6121 5. non-financial r
构造变量
assign: p155_ := 0:if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p155 number of percent range questions asked
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 2 decimals: 0
ref: secp.p155_
*
user note: this variable tracks the number of 0-100 scale questions asked.
.................................................................................
19971 0-19. actual value
941 blank. inap (inapplicable); partial interview
构造变量
assign: p156_ := 0:if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p156 number of percent range questions answered dk or rf
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 2 decimals: 0
ref: secp.p156_
*
user note: this variable tracks the number of 0-100 scale questions with dk or
rf answers.
.................................................................................
19971 0-10. actual value
941 blank. inap (inapplicable); partial interview
构造变量
assign: p195_altwave := (piinita504_currwavendx - 6) mod 2:if
((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p195 section p altwave flag
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.p195_altwave
*
.................................................................................
20912 1. asked this wave
blank. inap (inapplicable); partial interview
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p002 p002 - expectations intro
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations0.p002_
next we would like to ask your opinion about how likely you think various events
might be. when i ask a question i'd like for you to give me a number from 0 to
100, where '0' means that you think there is absolutely no chance, and '100'
means that you think the event is absolutely sure to happen.
for example, no one can ever be sure about tomorrow's weather, but if you think
that rain is very unlikely tomorrow, you might say that there is a 10 percent
chance of rain. if you think there is a very good chance that it will rain
tomorrow, you might say that there is an 80 percent chance of rain.
.................................................................................
19830 1. continue
4 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
12 9. rf (refused)
1066 blank. inap (inapplicable); partial interview
p196 in section reference - p166
section: p level: respondent type: character width: 4 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations0.homevalue.p196_
user note: an in section reference as to which fills were used at variable
p166.
.................................................................................
5086 less. less
4996 more. more
10830 blank. inap (inapplicable); partial interview
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations0.p002_
if (pirtab1x007afinfam in [financialr, financial_familyr]) and
((((pisechmainresidenceh004_ownrent = own_orbuying) or
(pisechmainresidenceh008_ownfarm in [ownsall, ownspart])) or
(pisechmainresidenceh011_ownfarmland = yes)) or
(pisechmainresidenceh014_ownmobile in [ownsbthhomeandsite, ownsonlyhome])) then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p166 chance home value up next year
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations0.homevalue.p166_
we are interested in how the value of your home will change in the future.
on the same scale from 0 to 100, what do you think is the percent chance that by
next year at this time your home will be worth [more/less] than it is today?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
user note: see the variable p196 for fill information.
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
9015 0 100 39.17 31.78 11634
-----------------------------------------------------------------
222 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
41 999. rf (refused)
p197 in section reference - p168
section: p level: respondent type: character width: 6 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations0.homevalue.p197_
user note: an in section reference as to which fills were used at variable
p168.
.................................................................................
4329 fallen. fallen
4996 gained. gained
11587 blank. inap (inapplicable); partial interview
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations0.homevalue.p166_
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p168 home value up/down x percent next year
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations0.homevalue.p168_
by this time next year, what is the percent chance that the value of your home
will have [fallen/gained] in value by more than [10/20/30/40] percent compared
to what it is worth today?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
user note: see the variable p197 for fill information.
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
8931 0 100 26.29 27.08 11635
-----------------------------------------------------------------
302 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
44 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations0.p002_
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p005 will r leave inheritance - 10k
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations0.p005_
think about an inheritance you [and your [husband/wife/partner]] might leave [,
but not including any inheritance you might leave to each other].
including property and other valuables that you might own, what are the chances
that you [and your [husband/wife/partner]] will leave an inheritance totaling
$10,000 or more?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
19144 0 100 62.22 40.17 1069
-----------------------------------------------------------------
439 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
260 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations0.p005_
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
if ((secp.expectations0.p005_ <> 0) and secp.expectations0.p005_ <>
nonresponse) and secp.expectations0.p005_ <> empty then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p006 will r leave inheritance - 100k
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations0.p006_
and what are the chances that you [and your [husband/wife/partner]] will leave
an inheritance totaling $100,000 or more?
iwer: include properties and other valuable items as well as money here
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
15471 0 100 51.52 40.64 5278
-----------------------------------------------------------------
108 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
55 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations0.p006_
if (secp.expectations0.p006_ > 0) and secp.expectations0.p006_ <> nonresponse
then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p059 chance r/sp leave inherit of 500k/more
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations0.p059_
and what are the chances that you [and your [husband/wife/partner]] will leave
an inheritance totaling $500,000 or more?
iwer: include properties and other valuable items as well as money here
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
12073 0 100 29.06 35.35 8748
-----------------------------------------------------------------
46 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
45 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations0.p006_
if (secp.expectations0.p005_ = 0) and secp.expectations0.p005_ <> nonresponse
then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p007 will r leave any inheritance
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations0.p007_
and what are the chances that you [and your [husband/wife/partner]] will leave
any inheritance?
iwer: include properties and other valuable items as well as money here
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
3472 0 100 14.15 29.45 17402
-----------------------------------------------------------------
35 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
3 999. rf (refused)
p009 r can do probability scales
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
ref: secp.p009_candoprobscales
*
user note: any r who refuses or does not know how to answer the first three
0-100 questions of section p, will not be asked any further questions in this
section. the actual sequence of questions varies and depends on specific skips.
.................................................................................
219 0. no
19625 1. yes
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
1068 blank. inap (inapplicable); partial interview
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
if (pisecjworkstatusj020_workforpay = yes) and (pisecjworkstatusj021_empselfoth
<> slfempd) then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p014 likelihood r will lose job
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p014_
sometimes people are permanently laid off from jobs that they want to keep.
on the same scale from 0 to 100 (where 0 means absolutely no chance and 100
means absolutely certain), what are the chances that you will lose your job
during the next year?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
6709 0 100 17.93 24.49 14109
-----------------------------------------------------------------
78 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
16 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations1.p014_
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p015 likelihood r will find another job
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p015_
suppose you were to lose your job this month.
what do you think are the chances that you could find an equally good job in the
same line of work within the next few months?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
6724 0 100 51.24 34.45 14115
-----------------------------------------------------------------
62 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
11 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
if pisecjworkstatusj020_workforpay <> yes then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p016 likelihood r will work for pay
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p016_
(on this same 0 to 100 scale), what are the chances that you will be working for
pay at some time in the future?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
11102 0 100 13.72 27.17 9659
-----------------------------------------------------------------
115 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
36 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
assign: p017_ := empty:{previous ask} secp.expectations1.p017_
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) and ((secp.expectations1.p016_ <> 0) or
secp.expectations1.p016_ = empty) then
if pisecacontinuinterviewa019_rage < 62 then
if ((secp.expectations1.p016_ > 0) and secp.expectations1.p016_ <> empty) or
(pisecjworkstatusj020_workforpay = yes) then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p017 likelihood r will work after age 62
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p017_
[thinking about work in general and not just your present job, what/what] do you
think the chances are that you will be working full-time after you reach age 62?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
996 already age 62
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
7462 0 100 51.07 36.30 13397
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1 996. already age 62
48 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
4 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) and ((secp.expectations1.p016_ <> 0) or
secp.expectations1.p016_ = empty) then
if pisecacontinuinterviewa019_rage < 62 then
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
if secp.expectations1.p017_ = 50 then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p123 work ft after 62_equally likely
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p123_
do you think it is about equally likely as it is unlikely or are you just
unsure?
.................................................................................
392 1. equally likely
729 2. unsure
5 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
19785 blank. inap (inapplicable); partial interview
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) and ((secp.expectations1.p016_ <> 0) or
secp.expectations1.p016_ = empty) then
if (secp.expectations1.p017_ = empty or (secp.expectations1.p017_ <> empty and
(secp.expectations1.p017_ <> 0))) and (pisecacontinuinterviewa019_rage < 65)
then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p018 likelihood r will work after age 65
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p018_
[thinking about work in general and not just your present job, what do you think
the chances are that you will be working full-time after you reach age 65?/and
what about the chances that you will be working full-time after you reach age
65?]
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
996 already age 65
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
7656 0 100 40.97 33.96 13209
-----------------------------------------------------------------
996. already age 65
42 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
5 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) and ((secp.expectations1.p016_ <> 0) or
secp.expectations1.p016_ = empty) then
if pisecacontinuinterviewa019_rage < 70 then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p181 likelihood r will do any work after age 70
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p181_
what are the chances that you will be doing any work for pay after you reach age
70?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
10287 0 100 24.89 30.06 10527
-----------------------------------------------------------------
85 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
13 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) and ((secp.expectations1.p016_ <> 0) or
secp.expectations1.p016_ = empty) then
if (((secp.expectations1.p017_ > 0) or secp.expectations1.p017_ = empty) and
((secp.expectations1.p018_ > 0) or secp.expectations1.p018_ = empty)) and
(secp.expectations1.p181_ > 0) then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p182 likelihood r will work after age 70
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p182_
[thinking about work in general and not just your present job, what/what] do you
think the chances are that you will be working full-time after you reach age 70?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
6265 0 100 23.57 27.06 14638
-----------------------------------------------------------------
8 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
if (pisecjedexpandlookingforjobj505_lookingforwork = yes) or
(pisecjfindingajobj517_doingfindwrk = yes) then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p020 chance r will find desired job in few mo
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p020_
you told us earlier that you were looking for a new job.
on this 0 to 100 scale, what are the chances that you will find a job like the
one you're looking for within the next few months?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
1715 0 100 54.65 32.14 19187
-----------------------------------------------------------------
8 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
if pisecacontinuinterviewa019_rage < 65 then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p028 chance r will live to be age 75 or more
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p028_
what is the percent chance that you will live to be 75 or more?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
10251 0 100 61.61 30.82 10332
-----------------------------------------------------------------
283 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
46 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations1.p028_
if secp.expectations1.p028_ = 50 then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p102 uncertainty live to 75
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p102_
do you think it is about equally likely as it is unlikely or are you just
unsure?
.................................................................................
720 1. equally likely
1546 2. unsure
11 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
18633 blank. inap (inapplicable); partial interview
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
if ((secp.expectations1.p028_ <> 0) and secp.expectations1.p028_ <> empty) or
secp.expectations1.p028_ = empty then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) and (pisecacontinuinterviewa019_rage < 90)
then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p029 chance r will live to 80/85/90/95/100
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p029_
what is the percent chance that you will live to be [85/80/90/95/100] or more?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
user note: fill values are assigned as follows:
85 (if age is < 65)
80 (if age is 65-69)
85 (if age is 70-74)
90 (if age is 75-79)
95 (if age is 80-84)
100 (if age is 85-89)
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
17822 0 100 48.55 31.86 2603
-----------------------------------------------------------------
445 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
42 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations1.p029_
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) and (pisecacontinuinterviewa019_rage > 64)
then
if secp.expectations1.p029_ = 50 then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p157 live to 80/85/90/95/100-equally likely
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p157_
do you think that it is about equally likely that you will die before
[85/80/90/95/100] as it is that you will live to [85/80/90/95/100] or beyond, or
are you just unsure about the chances?
.................................................................................
508 1. equally likely
1440 2. unsure
49 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
5 9. rf (refused)
18910 blank. inap (inapplicable); partial interview
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations1.p029_
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) and (pisecacontinuinterviewa019_rage > 64)
then
if pisecacontinuinterviewa019_rage < 90 then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p107 chance mentally ok at age-fill
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p107_
assuming that you are still living at [85/90/95/100] what are the chances that
you will be free of serious problems in thinking, reasoning or remembering
things that would interfere with your ability to manage your own affairs?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
user note: fill values are assigned as follows:
85 (if age is < 75)
90 (if age is 75-79)
95 (if age is 80-84)
100 (if age is 85-89)
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
8280 0 100 42.80 29.87 12206
-----------------------------------------------------------------
382 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
44 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p175 percent chance r will pay $1,500 med exp
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p175_
please think about what you might spend out-of-pocket for your own medical
expenses over the next year, including expenses such as doctor and dentist
expenses, hospitals, nursing homes, prescription drugs and any others. please
include expenses that you would pay yourself (or a family member for you), but
do not include what is covered by insurance.
on a scale from 0 to 100 (where 0 means absolutely no chance and 100 means
absolutely certain), what are the chances that you will spend more than $1,500
during the coming year?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
19135 0 100 42.66 36.74 1283
-----------------------------------------------------------------
409 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
85 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations1.p175_
if secp.expectations1.p175_ <> nonresponse then
if secp.expectations1.p175_ = 0 then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p176 percent chance r will pay $500 med exp
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p176_
(on this same, 0 to 100 scale where 0 means absolutely no chance and 100 means
absolutely certain,) what are the chances that you will spend more than $500
during the coming year?
iwer: premiums for health insurance and long-term care insurance should not be
included
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
3883 0 100 22.74 33.92 16971
-----------------------------------------------------------------
56 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations1.p176_
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p177 percent chance r will pay $3,000 med exp
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p177_
(on this same, 0 to 100 scale where 0 means absolutely no chance and 100 means
absolutely certain,) what are the chances that you will spend more than $3,000
during the coming year?
iwer: premiums for health insurance and long-term care insurance should not be
included
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
15041 0 100 32.85 31.40 5718
-----------------------------------------------------------------
141 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
12 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations1.p177_
if secp.expectations1.p177_ > 0 then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p178 percent chance r will pay $8,000 med exp
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p178_
(on this same, 0 to 100 scale where 0 means absolutely no chance and 100 means
absolutely certain,) what are the chances that you will spend more than $8,000
during the coming year?
iwer: premiums for health insurance and long-term care insurance should not be
included
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
12576 0 100 19.62 24.56 8237
-----------------------------------------------------------------
91 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
8 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
if (pisecacontinuinterviewa019_rage > 64) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr)
then
if pisecarelationsa028_rinnhome <> yes then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p032 percent chance r will move to nh in 5yr
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p032_
[what is the percent chance that you will ever have to move to a nursing
home?/what is the percent chance that you will move to a nursing home in the
next five years?]
def: (nursing homes are institutions primarily for people who need constant
nursing supervision or are incapable of living independently. nursing
supervision must be provided on a continuous basis for the institution to
qualify as a nursing home. please don't include stays in adult foster care
facilities or other short-term stays in a hospital.)
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
user note: if r's age is less than 65 (a019 < 65), then the first fill is used.
otherwise, the second fill is used.
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
12846 0 100 19.11 25.19 7644
-----------------------------------------------------------------
371 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
51 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
if pisecjsocialsecurityj478_ = yes then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p111 chance your soc sec benefit less 10 yrs
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p111_
on a scale from 0 to 100, (where 0 means no chance and 100 means absolutely
certain,) what do you think is the percent chance that the benefits you yourself
are receiving from social security will be cut some time over the next 10 years?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
10080 0 100 39.15 31.27 10357
-----------------------------------------------------------------
440 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
35 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations1.p111_
if pisecjsocialsecurityj479_ = yes then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p112 chance your future socsec benefits less
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p112_
on a scale from 0 to 100, what do you think is the percent chance that over the
next 10 years there will be changes to social security that will reduce your
future benefits compared to what you would get under the current system?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
7198 0 100 60.30 29.29 13515
-----------------------------------------------------------------
182 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
17 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p183 chance your future socsec benefits less
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.p183_
what is the percent chance that congress will change the medicare program
sometime in the next 10 years, so that it becomes less generous than now?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
18868 0 100 58.05 30.59 1288
-----------------------------------------------------------------
689 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
67 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p047 chance mutual funds worth more nxt yr
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p047_
by next year at this time, what is the percent chance that mutual fund shares
invested in blue chip stocks like those in the dow jones industrial average will
be worth more than they are today?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
17048 0 100 46.53 26.07 1288
-----------------------------------------------------------------
2427 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
149 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p047_
if secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p047_ = 50 then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p113 epistemic uncertainty stocks up or down
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p113_
do you think that it is about equally likely that these mutual fund shares will
increase in worth as it is that they will decrease in worth by this time next
year, or are you just unsure about the chances?
.................................................................................
1269 1. equally likely
4509 2. unsure
61 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
15071 blank. inap (inapplicable); partial interview
构造变量
assign: p149_ := epistemic:{previous ask} secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p047_
if (((secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p047_ = dontknow) or
(secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p047_ = refusal)) or
(secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p113_ = unsure)) or
(secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p113_ = dontknow) then
assign: p149_ := nonepistemic:{previous ask}
secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p047_
if not((((secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p047_ = dontknow) or
(secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p047_ = refusal)) or
(secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p113_ = unsure)) or
(secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p113_ = dontknow)) then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p149 if epistemic answers (generated)
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p149_
user note: if r answered dk or rf at p047 (p047 = dk or rf) or answered unsure
or dk at p113 (p113 = 2 or dk), then code 1 (epistemic response) is assigned to
p149
.................................................................................
7146 1. epistemic response
12479 2. non-epistemic response
1287 blank. inap (inapplicable); partial interview
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p047_
if secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p149_ = nonepistemic then
if secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p047_ <> 0 then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p150 market up/down by x percent next year
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p150_
by next year at this time, what is the percent chance that mutual fund shares
invested in blue chip stocks (like those in the dow jones industrial average)
will have gained in value by more than 20 percent compared to what they are
worth today?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
10976 0 100 34.45 25.93 9680
-----------------------------------------------------------------
242 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
14 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p047_
if secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p149_ = nonepistemic then
if (secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p150_ <> nonresponse and
(secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p150_ <> 100)) and
(secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p047_ <> 100) then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p180 chance market down 20 percent next year
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p180_
by next year at this time, what is the percent chance that mutual fund shares
invested in blue-chip stocks (like those in the dow jones industrial average)
will have fallen in value by more than 20 percent compared to what they are
worth today?
(0---10---20---30---40---50---60---70---80---90---100)
0 absolutely no chance
100 absolutely certain
.................................................................................
-----------------------------------------------------------------
n min max mean sd miss
11154 0 100 33.15 24.51 9566
-----------------------------------------------------------------
175 998. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
17 999. rf (refused)
构造变量
{previous ask} secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p047_
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p097 how closely follow stock market
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p097_
how closely do you follow the stock market: very closely, somewhat, or not at
all?
.................................................................................
1236 1. very closely
7216 2. somewhat closely
11089 3. not at all
66 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
17 9. rf (refused)
1288 blank. inap (inapplicable); partial interview
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
if ((secp.p195_altwave = 0) and (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v = reiwr)) or
(pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p041 fam financial timeline - save/spend/plan
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p041_
iwer: read slowly
in planning your (family's) saving and spending, which of the following time
periods is most important to you [and your [husband/wife/partner]], the next few
months, the next year, the next few years, the next 5-10 years, or longer than
10 years?
.................................................................................
863 1. the next few months
438 2. the next year
900 3. the next few years
1347 4. the next 5-10 years
772 5. longer than 10 years
58 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
19 9. rf (refused)
16515 blank. inap (inapplicable); partial interview
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
if (secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes) or (pirvarsz076_reiwr_v <> reiwr) then
if secp.p009_candoprobscales = yes then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p185 ten yrs from now standard living rating
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
ref: secp.expectations1.mutualfunds.p185_
10 years from now, do you think your own standard of living will be higher,
lower or the same as now?
.................................................................................
5615 1. higher
3779 2. lower
9933 3. same
256 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
41 9. rf (refused)
1288 blank. inap (inapplicable); partial interview
构造变量
if ((((seca.continuinterview.a218_agegreaterthan17 > 17) or
(seca.continuinterview.a019_rage > 17)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <>
newpostexit)) and (rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> firstrepeatpost)) and
(rvars.z145_typeexit_v <> secrepeatpost) then
if seca.startinterview.a007tralive_a = yes then
if pisecastartinterviewa009_selfprxy = slf then
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
p056 p056 - assist section p - expectations
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
ref: secp.p056_assistp
iwer: how often did r receive assistance with answers in section p -
expectations?
.................................................................................
18907 1. never
607 2. a few times
268 3. most or all of the time
58 4. the section was done by a proxy reporter
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
3 9. rf (refused)
1069 blank. inap (inapplicable); partial interview
vdate 2016 data model version
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 2 decimals: 0
user note: this variable identifies which data model was used to interview the
household. please reference the data description for a summary of changes in
each data model.
.................................................................................
235 1. version 1
1172 2. version 2
1817 3. version 3
3140 4. version 4
4251 5. version 5
702 6. version 6
2007 7. version 7
1038 8. version 8
1330 9. version 9
3703 10. version 10
155 11. version 11
605 12. version 12
757 13. version 13
version 2016 data release version
section: p level: respondent type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
.................................................................................
20912 2. hrs 2016 final release