section pc: proxy cognition (respondent)
==========================================================================================
2000 hrs core (final release)
odbc reference: [hrs2000]
perl script: codebkd9.pl v5.04 wed oct 23 12:11:29 edt 2002
note to users: the program that generated this codebook is under development.
if you have any questions or suggestions concerning codebook layout or content
please bring them to the attention of the hrs staff at hrsquest@isr.umich.edu.
printing recommendation: set margins (left/right/top/bottom) to .5"; print in
portrait orientation using a mono-space 10-point font.
==========================================================================================
hhid household identifier
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9000
type: character width: 6 decimals: 0
................................................................................
19580 000002-213479. household identifier range
pn person number
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9021
type: character width: 3 decimals: 0
user note: respondent person numbers ending in 0 are generally from the
original sample; respondent person numbers ending in 1 or 2 are generally
new spouses or partners added since the original sample.
................................................................................
11086 010. person number
311 011. person number
6 012. person number
5918 020. person number
50 021. person number
1 022. person number
904 030. person number
24 031. person number
1 032. person number
1246 040. person number
33 041. person number
subhh 2000 sub-household identifier
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9007
type: character width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
18906 0. original sample household - no split from divorce or
separation of spouses or partners
358 1. split household - one half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
264 2. split household - other half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
11 5. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
1 6. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
40 7. reunited household - respondents from split household reunite
fsubhh 1998 sub-household identifier
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9006
type: character width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
19062 0. original sample household - no split from divorce or
separation of spouses or partners
265 1. split household - one half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
218 2. split household - other half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
6 5. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
6. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
29 7. reunited household - respondents from split household reunite
pn_sp 2000 spouse/partner person number
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9031
type: character width: 3 decimals: 0
user note: the person number of the spouse or partner of this respondent if
the spouse or partner also provided a core interview.
................................................................................
5515 010. person number
269 011. person number
6 012. person number
4986 020. person number
41 021. person number
1 022. person number
779 030. person number
22 031. person number
1 032. person number
1082 040. person number
30 041. person number
6848 blank. inap (inapplicable) - no spouse interview
csr 2000 whether coversheet respondent
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9061
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
13091 1. yes
95 2. yes - household had two coversheet respondents and the
coversheet information given by this respondent has been
retained.
3. yes - household had two coversheet respondents for some
sections and the coversheet information given by this
respondent has been retained.
4. no - household had no coversheet respondents but the person
number of this respondent appears as the gpn_cs in the
household record.
6299 5. no
95 6. no - household had two coversheet respondents and the
coversheet information given by this respondent has not been
retained.
7. no - household had two coversheet respondents for some
sections and the coversheet information given by this
respondent has not been retained.
8. no - household had no coversheet respondents and the person
number of this respondent appears as the gpn_ncs in the
household record.
famr 2000 whether family respondent
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9062
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
13096 1. yes
11 2. yes - household had two family respondents and the family
information given by this respondent has been retained.
3. yes - household had two family respondents for some sections
and the family information given by this respondent has been
retained.
4. no - household had no family respondents but the person number
of this respondent appears as the gpn_fam in the household
record.
6462 5. no
11 6. no - household had two family respondents and the family
information given by this respondent has not been retained.
7. no - household had two family respondents for some sections
and the family information given by this respondent has not
been retained.
8. no - household had no family respondents and the person number
of this respondent appears as the gpn_nfam in the household
record.
finr 2000 whether financial respondent
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9063
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
13107 1. yes
10 2. yes - household had two financial respondents and the
financial information given by this respondent has been
retained.
3. yes - household had two financial respondents for some
sections and the financial information given by this
respondent has been retained.
4. no - household had no financial respondents but the person
number of this respondent appears as the gpn_fin in the
household record.
6453 5. no
10 6. no - household had two financial respondents and the financial
information given by this respondent has not been retained.
7. no - household had two financial respondents for some sections
and the financial information given by this respondent has not
been retained.
8. no - household had no financial respondents and the person
number of this respondent appears as the gpn_nfin in the
household record.
qdt 2000 q_naire file
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9080
type: character width: 1 decimals: 0
user note: questionnaire data file.
................................................................................
7125 8. ahead and coda cohort data file
12455 9. hrs and war baby cohort data file
qnr 2000 questionnaire
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9070
type: character width: 5 decimals: 0
user note: range is not continuous because some questionnaires were
invalid.
................................................................................
19580 00001-12458. questionnaire number range
v1527 pc1.rate memory
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1527
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc1.
part of this study is concerned with people's memory, and
ability to think about things. first, how would you
rate [q754-cs22y31.r first name]'s memory at the present time?
would you say it is excellent, very good, good, fair or poor?
................................................................................
235 1. excellent
383 2. very good
570 3. good
448 4. fair
421 5. poor
5 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
17518 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1528 pc2.rate memory past
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1528
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc2.
compared to (two years ago/q218-pr218.prev wave iw month / q219-
pr219.prev wave iw year),
would you say [q754-cs22y31.r first name]'s memory is better now,
about the same, or worse now than it was then?
................................................................................
13 1. better
585 2. same
104 3. worse
3 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
18875 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (ge
65); partial interview
v1532 pc3.rate judgment
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1532
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc3.
how would you rate
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] in making judgements and
decisions? would you say (he/she) is excellent, very
good, good, fair, or poor?
................................................................................
112 1. excellent
213 2. very good
299 3. good
289 4. fair
438 5. poor
6 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1537 pc5.rate organize
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1537
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc5.
how would you rate [q754-cs22y31.r first name]'s ability to
organize (his/her) daily activities?
(would you say (he/she) is excellent, very good,
good, fair, or poor?)
................................................................................
134 1. excellent
205 2. very good
327 3. good
233 4. fair
455 5. poor
3 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1542 pc7.jorm introduction
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1542
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc7.
now we want you to remember what
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] was
like two years ago and to compare it with what (he/she)
is like now. two years ago was in
[q781.]. i will read situations
where
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] has to use (his/her) memory or
intelligence and we would like you to indicate whether this has
improved, stayed the same, or gotten worse in that situation over
the past two years. note the importance of comparing (his/her)
present performance with two years ago. so if two years ago
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] always forgot where (he/she) had left
things, and (he/she) still does, then this would be considered
"not much change".
user note: this preamble variable has been included in this data set in
order to document questionnaire flow; all data values are blanks.
................................................................................
19580 blank. no data
v1543 pc8.things: birthdays-occupations
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1543
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc8.
compared with two years ago, how is
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] at:
remembering things about family and friends, such as
occupations, birthdays, and addresses. has this improved,
not much changed, or gotten worse?
................................................................................
15 1. improved
869 2. not much changed
471 3. gotten worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1544 pc8a.improved things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1544
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc8a.
is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
9 1. much improved
6 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19565 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1543:pc8] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1543:pc8] is (3);
partial interview
v1545 pc8b.worse things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1545
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc8b.
is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
198 4. a bit worse
273 5. much worse
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19109 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1543:pc8] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1543:pc8] is (1);
partial interview
v1548 pc9.things: recent
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1548
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc9.
compared with two years ago, how is
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] at:
remembering things that have happened recently?
(has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
18 1. improved
809 2. not much changed
527 3. gotten worse
2 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1549 pc9a.improved things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1549
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc9a.
is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
7 1. much improved
11 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19562 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1548:pc9] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1548:pc9] is (3);
partial interview
v1550 pc9b.worse things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1550
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc9b.
is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
218 4. a bit worse
308 5. much worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19053 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1548:pc9] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1548:pc9] is (1);
partial interview
v1553 pc10.conversations: recall
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1553
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc10.
(compared with two years ago, how is
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] at:)
recalling conversations a few days later?
(has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
19 1. improved
785 2. not much changed
548 3. gotten worse
4 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1554 pc10a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1554
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc10a.
is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
2 1. much improved
17 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19561 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1553:pc10] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1553:pc10] is (3);
partial interview
v1555 pc10b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1555
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc10b.
is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
230 4. a bit worse
318 5. much worse
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19032 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1553:pc10] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1553:pc10] is (1);
partial interview
v1558 pc11.rememberng: own phone
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1558
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc11.
(compared with two years ago, how is
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] at:)
remembering (his/her) address and telephone number?
(has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
16 1. improved
958 2. not much changed
369 3. gotten worse
13 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1559 pc11a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1559
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc11a.
is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
8 1. much improved
8 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19564 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1558:pc11] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1558:pc11] is (3);
partial interview
v1560 pc11b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1560
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc11b.
is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
94 4. a bit worse
275 5. much worse
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19211 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1558:pc11] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1558:pc11] is (1);
partial interview
v1563 pc12.rememberng: day-month
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1563
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc12.
(compared with two years ago, how is
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] at:)
remembering what day and month it is?
(has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
7 1. improved
875 2. not much changed
470 3. gotten worse
4 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1564 pc12a.improved things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1564
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc12a.
is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
3 1. much improved
4 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19573 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1563:pc12] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1563:pc12] is (3);
partial interview
v1565 pc12b.worse things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1565
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc12b.
is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
158 4. a bit worse
312 5. much worse
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19110 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1563:pc12] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1563:pc12] is (1);
partial interview
v1568 pc13.rememberng: usual kept
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1568
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc13.
(compared with two years ago, how is
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] at:)
remembering where things are usually kept?
(has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
15 1. improved
886 2. not much changed
449 3. gotten worse
6 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1569 pc13a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1569
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc13a.
is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
5 1. much improved
10 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19565 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1568:pc13] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1568:pc13] is (3);
partial interview
v1570 pc13b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1570
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc13b.
is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
178 4. a bit worse
270 5. much worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19131 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1568:pc13] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1568:pc13] is (1);
partial interview
v1573 pc14.rememberng: different place
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1573
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc14.
(compared with two years ago, how is
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] at:)
remembering where to find things which have been put
in a different place than usual?
(has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
9 1. improved
750 2. not much changed
584 3. gotten worse
13 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1574 pc14a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1574
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc14a.
is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
3 1. much improved
6 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19571 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1573:pc14] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1573:pc14] is (3);
partial interview
v1575 pc14b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1575
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc14b.
is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
252 4. a bit worse
332 5. much worse
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
18996 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1573:pc14] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1573:pc14] is (1);
partial interview
v1578 pc15.working usual machines
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1578
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc15.
(compared with two years ago, how is
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] at:)
knowing how to work familiar machines around the house?
(has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
13 1. improved
889 2. not much changed
407 3. gotten worse
40 4. does not apply; r doesn't do activity
7 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1579 pc15a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1579
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc15a.
is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
3 1. much improved
10 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19567 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1578:pc15] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1578:pc15] is (3);
partial interview
v1580 pc15b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1580
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc15b.
is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
103 4. a bit worse
313 5. much worse
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19164 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1578:pc15] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1578:pc15] is (1);
partial interview
v1583 pc16.learning new machines
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1583
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc16.
(compared with two years ago, how is
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] at:)
learning to use a new gadget or machine around the house?
(has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
12 1. improved
801 2. not much changed
495 3. gotten worse
25 4. does not apply; r doesn't do activity
23 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1584 pc16a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1584
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc16a.
is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
5 1. much improved
7 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19568 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1583:pc16] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1583:pc16] is (3);
partial interview
v1585 pc16b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1585
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc16b.
is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
139 4. a bit worse
359 5. much worse
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19082 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1583:pc16] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1583:pc16] is (1);
partial interview
v1588 pc17.learning new things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1588
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc17.
(compared with two years ago, how is
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] at:)
learning new things in general?
(has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
17 1. improved
839 2. not much changed
479 3. gotten worse
7 4. does not apply; r doesn't do activity
14 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1589 pc17a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1589
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc17a.
is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
5 1. much improved
12 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19563 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1588:pc17] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1588:pc17] is (3);
partial interview
v1590 pc17b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1590
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc17b.
is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
150 4. a bit worse
329 5. much worse
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19101 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1588:pc17] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1588:pc17] is (1);
partial interview
v1593 pc18.following story
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1593
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc18.
(compared with two years ago, how is
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] at:)
following a story in a book or on tv?
(has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
22 1. improved
913 2. not much changed
400 3. gotten worse
10 4. does not apply; r doesn't do activity
10 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1594 pc18a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1594
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc18a.
is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
8 1. much improved
14 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19558 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1593:pc18] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1593:pc18] is (3);
partial interview
v1595 pc18b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1595
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc18b.
is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
122 4. a bit worse
280 5. much worse
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19178 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1593:pc18] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1593:pc18] is (1);
partial interview
v1598 pc19.making decisions
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1598
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc19.
(compared with two years ago, how is
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] at:)
making decisions on everyday matters?
(has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
17 1. improved
864 2. not much changed
465 3. gotten worse
7 4. does not apply; r doesn't do activity
3 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1599 pc19a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1599
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc19a.
is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
6 1. much improved
11 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19563 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1598:pc19] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1598:pc19] is (3);
partial interview
v1600 pc19b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1600
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc19b.
is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
133 4. a bit worse
333 5. much worse
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19114 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1598:pc19] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1598:pc19] is (1);
partial interview
v1602 pc20.handling shop money
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1602
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc20.
(compared with two years ago, how is
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] at:)
handling money for shopping?
(has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
9 1. improved
851 2. not much changed
427 3. gotten worse
60 4. does not apply; r doesn't do activity
8 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1603 pc20a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1603
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc20a.
is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
5 1. much improved
4 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19571 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1602:pc20] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1602:pc20] is (3);
partial interview
v1604 pc20b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1604
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc20b.
is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
99 4. a bit worse
344 5. much worse
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19137 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1602:pc20] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1602:pc20] is (1);
partial interview
v1605 pc21.handling finances
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1605
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc21.
(compared with two years ago, how is
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] at:)
handling financial matters, that is, (his/her) pension or
dealing with the bank?
(has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
9 1. improved
806 2. not much changed
457 3. gotten worse
74 4. does not apply; r doesn't do activity
10 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1606 pc21a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1606
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc21a.
is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
3 1. much improved
6 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19571 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1605:pc21] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1605:pc21] is (3);
partial interview
v1607 pc21b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1607
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc21b.
is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
107 4. a bit worse
373 5. much worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19099 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1605:pc21] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1605:pc21] is (1);
partial interview
v1608 pc22.arithmetic problems
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1608
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc22.
(compared with two years ago, how is
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] at:)
handling other everyday arithmetic problems, such as,
knowing how much food to buy, knowing how long between
visits from family or friends?
(has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
7 1. improved
886 2. not much changed
440 3. gotten worse
18 4. does not apply; r doesn't do activity
5 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1609 pc22a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1609
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc22a.
is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
5 1. much improved
2 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19573 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1608:pc22] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1608:pc22] is (3);
partial interview
v1610 pc22b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1610
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc22b.
is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
95 4. a bit worse
348 5. much worse
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19137 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1608:pc22] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1608:pc22] is (1);
partial interview
v1611 pc23.reasoning
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1611
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc23.
(compared with two years ago, how is
[q754-cs22y31.r first name] at:)
using (his/her) intelligence to understand what's
going on and to reason things through?
(has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
14 1. improved
905 2. not much changed
432 3. gotten worse
5 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1612 pc23a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1612
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc23a.
is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
5 1. much improved
9 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19566 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1611:pc23] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1611:pc23] is (3);
partial interview
v1613 pc23b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1613
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc23b.
is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
138 4. a bit worse
294 5. much worse
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
19148 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); [q1611:pc23] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1611:pc23] is (1);
partial interview
v1615 pc24.lost
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1615
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc24.
now, thinking about some current behaviors, does (he/she)
ever get lost in a familiar environment?
................................................................................
286 1. yes
1052 5. no
18 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1616 pc25.wander
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1616
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc25.
does (he/she) ever wander off and not return by (himself/herself)?
................................................................................
74 1. yes
4. r cannot wander off
1274 5. no
8 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1617 pc26.left alone
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1617
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc26.
can (he/she) be left alone for an hour or so?
................................................................................
1037 1. yes
313 5. no
7 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1618 pc27.hallucinate
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1618
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc27.
does (he/she) ever see or hear things that are not really there?
................................................................................
233 1. yes
1105 5. no
19 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1619 pc28.angry
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1619
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc28.
during the past week, how often has (he/she) shown any
of the following behaviors:
(during the past week) how often has (he/she) become angry
or hostile without reason? was it most of the time, some of
the time, or never?
................................................................................
53 1. most of time
316 2. some of time
970 3. never
16 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1620 pc29.sleep
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1620
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc29.
(during the past week)
how often has (he/she) had difficulties falling asleep or
waking frequently during the night?
................................................................................
187 1. most of time
415 2. some of time
717 3. never
37 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1621 pc30.dangerous
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1621
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc30.
(during the past week)
how often has (he/she) done things that are dangerous
to (himself/herself) or others?
................................................................................
18 1. most of time
120 2. some of time
1205 3. never
13 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1622 pc31.rocking
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1622
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc31.
(during the past week)
how often has (he/she) paced around or made unexplained
rocking movements while sitting?
................................................................................
49 1. most of time
100 2. some of time
1195 3. never
12 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1623 pc32.plotting
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1623
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc32.
(during the past week)
how often has (he/she) mentioned that people are plotting
against or trying to harm (him/her)?
................................................................................
38 1. most of time
116 2. some of time
1194 3. never
7 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
v1624 pc33.alcohol
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1624
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc33.
(during the past week)
how often has (he/she) drunk too much alcohol?
................................................................................
8 1. most of time
23 2. some of time
1322 3. never
3 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
18223 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q514:cs1a] is (1); [q1101:a21y1] is (lt
65); partial interview
version 2000 data release version
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q20001
type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
................................................................................
19580 1. version 1, september 2002