section pc: proxy cognition (respondent)
==========================================================================================
1998 hrs core (final release)
odbc reference: [hrs98corefinal]
perl script: codebkd9.pl v5.04 wed oct 1 10:27:26 edt 2003
note to users: the program that generated this codebook is under development.
if you have any questions or suggestions concerning codebook layout or content
please bring them to the attention of the hrs staff at hrsquest@isr.umich.edu.
printing recommendation: set margins (left/right/top/bottom) to .5"; print in
portrait orientation using a mono-space 10-point font.
==========================================================================================
hhid household identifier
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9000
type: character width: 6 decimals: 0
................................................................................
21384 000002-213479. household identifier range
pn person number
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9021
type: character width: 3 decimals: 0
user note: the range 10-49 is reserved for respondent person numbers.
respondent person numbers ending in 0 are generally from the original
sample; respondent person numbers ending in 1 are generally new spouses
added since the original sample.
................................................................................
12445 010. person number
240 011. person number
2 012. person number
6329 020. person number
37 021. person number
965 030. person number
18 031. person number
1 032. person number
1329 040. person number
18 041. person number
subhh 1998 sub-household identifier
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9006
type: character width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
20863 0. original sample household - no split from divorce or
separation of spouses or partners
275 1. split household - one half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
211 2. split household - other half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
6 5. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
6. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
29 7. reunited household - respondents from split household reunite
esubhh 1996 sub-household identifier
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9005
type: character width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
10219 0. original sample household - no split from divorce or
separation of spouses or partners
197 1. split household - one half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
151 2. split household - other half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
3 5. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
6. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
14 7. reunited household - respondents from split household reunite
10800 blank. new cohort - esubhh does not exist
dsubhh 1995 sub-household identifier
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9004
type: character width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
5939 0. original sample household - no split from divorce or
separation of spouses or partners
7 1. split household - one half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
5 2. split household - other half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
5. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
6. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
7. reunited household - respondents from split household reunite
15433 blank. new cohort - dsubhh does not exist
pn_sp 1998 spouse/partner person number
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9031
type: character width: 3 decimals: 0
user note: the range 10-49 is reserved for respondent person numbers.
respondent person numbers ending in 0 are generally from the original
sample; respondent person numbers ending in 1 are generally new spouses
added since the original sample.
................................................................................
6091 010. person number
221 011. person number
2 012. person number
5572 020. person number
32 021. person number
848 030. person number
17 031. person number
1 032. person number
1176 040. person number
18 041. person number
7406 blank. inap (inapplicable) - no spouse interview
csr 1998 whether coversheet respondent
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9061
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
13894 1. yes
477 2. yes - household had two coversheet respondents and the
coversheet information given by this respondent has been
retained.
3. yes - household had two coversheet respondents for some
sections and the coversheet information given by this
respondent has been retained.
4. no - household had no coversheet respondents but the person
number of this respondent appears as the fpn_cs in the
household record.
6536 5. no
477 6. no - household had two coversheet respondents and the
coversheet information given by this respondent has not been
retained.
7. no - household had two coversheet respondents for some
sections and the coversheet information given by this
respondent has not been retained.
8. no - household had no coversheet respondents and the person
number of this respondent appears as the fpn_ncs in the
household record.
famr 1998 whether family respondent
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9062
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
14192 1. yes
11 2. yes - household had two family respondents and the family
information given by this respondent has been retained.
3. yes - household had two family respondents for some sections
and the family information given by this respondent has been
retained.
18 4. no - household had no family respondents but the person number
of this respondent appears as the fpn_fam in the household
record.
7134 5. no
11 6. no - household had two family respondents and the family
information given by this respondent has not been retained.
7. no - household had two family respondents for some sections
and the family information given by this respondent has not
been retained.
18 8. no - household had no family respondents and the person number
of this respondent appears as the fpn_nfam in the household
record.
finr 1998 whether financial respondent
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9063
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
14223 1. yes
10 2. yes - household had two financial respondents and the
financial information given by this respondent has been
retained.
24 3. yes - household had two financial respondents for some
sections and the financial information given by this
respondent has been retained.
3 4. no - household had no financial respondents but the person
number of this respondent appears as the fpn_fin in the
household record.
7087 5. no
10 6. no - household had two financial respondents and the financial
information given by this respondent has not been retained.
24 7. no - household had two financial respondents for some sections
and the financial information given by this respondent has not
been retained.
3 8. no - household had no financial respondents and the person
number of this respondent appears as the fpn_nfin in the
household record.
qnr 1998 questionnaire
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9070
type: character width: 5 decimals: 0
user note: range is not continuous because some questionnaires were
invalid.
................................................................................
21384 00001-21402. questionnaire number range
v1373 pc1.rate memory
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1373
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc1. part of this study is concerned with people's memory, and ability to
think about things. first, how would you rate [q683-r first name]'s memory
at the present time? would you say it is excellent, very good, good, fair or
poor?
................................................................................
278 1. excellent
398 2. very good
558 3. good
415 4. fair
387 5. poor
8 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
19339 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1374 pc2.rate memory past
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1374
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc2. compared to (two years ago/q218-prev wave iw month / q219-prev wave iw
year), would you say [q683-r first name]'s memory is better now, about the
same, or worse now than it was then?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (ge 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
18 1. better
630 2. same
99 3. worse
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20637 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (ge 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (1-
2)); partial interview
v1378 pc3.rate judgment
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1378
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc3. how would you rate [q683-r first name] in making judgements and
decisions? would you say (he/she) is excellent, very good, good, fair, or
poor?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
109 1. excellent
216 2. very good
305 3. good
247 4. fair
415 5. poor
7 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20085 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1383 pc5.rate organize
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1383
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc5. how would you rate [q683-r first name]'s ability to organize (his/her)
daily activities? (would you say (he/she) is excellent, very good, good,
fair, or poor?)
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
120 1. excellent
223 2. very good
306 3. good
203 4. fair
439 5. poor
8 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20085 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1388 pc7.jorm introduction
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1388
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc7. now we want you to remember what [q683-r first name] was like two years
ago and to compare it with what (he/she) is like now. two years ago was in
1996. i will read situations where [q683-r first name] has to use (his/her)
memory or intelligence and we would like you to indicate whether this has
improved, stayed the same, or gotten worse in that situation over the past
two years. note the importance of comparing (his/her) present performance
with two years ago. so if two years ago [q683-r first name] always forgot
where (he/she) had left things, and (he/she) still does, then this would be
considered "not much change".
user note: this preamble variable has been included in this data set in
order to document questionnaire flow; all data values are blanks.
................................................................................
21384 blank. no data
v1389 pc8.things: birthdays-occupations
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1389
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc8. compared with two years ago, how is [q683-r first name] at:
remembering things about family and friends, such as occupations, birthdays,
and addresses. has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
25 1. improved
831 2. not much changed
441 3. gotten worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1390 pc8a.improved things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1390
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc8a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
12 1. much improved
13 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21359 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1389:pc8] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1389:pc8] is (3);
partial interview
v1391 pc8b.worse things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1391
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc8b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
179 4. a bit worse
261 5. much worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20943 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1389:pc8] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1389:pc8] is (1);
partial interview
v1394 pc9.things: recent
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1394
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc9. compared with two years ago, how is [q683-r first name] at:
remembering things that have happened recently? (has this improved, not much
changed, or gotten worse?)
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
30 1. improved
761 2. not much changed
504 3. gotten worse
3 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1395 pc9a.improved things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1395
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc9a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
14 1. much improved
16 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21354 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1394:pc9] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1394:pc9] is (3);
partial interview
v1396 pc9b.worse things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1396
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc9b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
197 4. a bit worse
306 5. much worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20880 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1394:pc9] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1394:pc9] is (1);
partial interview
v1399 pc10.conversations: recall
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1399
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc10. (compared with two years ago, how is [q683-r first name] at:)
recalling conversations a few days later? (has this improved, not much
changed, or gotten worse?)
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
26 1. improved
751 2. not much changed
515 3. gotten worse
6 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1400 pc10a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1400
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc10a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
15 1. much improved
11 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21358 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1399:pc10] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1399:pc10] is (3);
partial interview
v1401 pc10b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1401
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc10b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
199 4. a bit worse
315 5. much worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20869 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1399:pc10] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1399:pc10] is (1);
partial interview
v1404 pc11.rememberng: own phone
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1404
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc11. (compared with two years ago, how is [q683-r first name] at:)
remembering (his/her) address and telephone number? (has this improved, not
much changed, or gotten worse?)
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
19 1. improved
899 2. not much changed
371 3. gotten worse
8 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1405 pc11a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1405
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc11a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
9 1. much improved
10 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21365 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1404:pc11] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1404:pc11] is (3);
partial interview
v1406 pc11b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1406
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc11b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
91 4. a bit worse
279 5. much worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21013 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1404:pc11] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1404:pc11] is (1);
partial interview
v1409 pc12.rememberng: day-month
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1409
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc12. (compared with two years ago, how is [q683-r first name] at:)
remembering what day and month it is? (has this improved, not much changed,
or gotten worse?)
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
19 1. improved
808 2. not much changed
467 3. gotten worse
3 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1410 pc12a.improved things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1410
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc12a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
11 1. much improved
8 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21365 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1409:pc12] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1409:pc12] is (3);
partial interview
v1411 pc12b.worse things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1411
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc12b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
163 4. a bit worse
303 5. much worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20917 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1409:pc12] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1409:pc12] is (1);
partial interview
v1414 pc13.rememberng: usual kept
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1414
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc13. (compared with two years ago, how is [q683-r first name] at:)
remembering where things are usually kept? (has this improved, not much
changed, or gotten worse?)
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
24 1. improved
845 2. not much changed
421 3. gotten worse
8 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1415 pc13a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1415
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc13a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
14 1. much improved
10 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21360 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1414:pc13] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1414:pc13] is (3);
partial interview
v1416 pc13b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1416
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc13b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
151 4. a bit worse
269 5. much worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20963 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1414:pc13] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1414:pc13] is (1);
partial interview
v1419 pc14.rememberng: different place
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1419
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc14. (compared with two years ago, how is [q683-r first name] at:)
remembering where to find things which have been put in a different place
than usual? (has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
16 1. improved
721 2. not much changed
541 3. gotten worse
19 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1420 pc14a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1420
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc14a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
12 1. much improved
4 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21368 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1419:pc14] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1419:pc14] is (3);
partial interview
v1421 pc14b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1421
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc14b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
202 4. a bit worse
338 5. much worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20843 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1419:pc14] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1419:pc14] is (1);
partial interview
v1424 pc15.working usual machines
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1424
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc15. (compared with two years ago, how is [q683-r first name] at:)
knowing how to work familiar machines around the house? (has this improved,
not much changed, or gotten worse?)
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
16 1. improved
866 2. not much changed
375 3. gotten worse
27 4. does not apply; r doesn't do activity
13 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1425 pc15a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1425
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc15a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
8 1. much improved
8 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21368 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1424:pc15] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1424:pc15] is (3);
partial interview
v1426 pc15b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1426
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc15b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
82 4. a bit worse
291 5. much worse
2 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21009 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1424:pc15] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1424:pc15] is (1);
partial interview
v1429 pc16.learning new machines
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1429
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc16. (compared with two years ago, how is [q683-r first name] at:)
learning to use a new gadget or machine around the house? (has this
improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
19 1. improved
781 2. not much changed
459 3. gotten worse
14 4. does not apply; r doesn't do activity
24 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1430 pc16a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1430
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc16a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
7 1. much improved
12 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21365 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1429:pc16] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1429:pc16] is (3);
partial interview
v1431 pc16b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1431
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc16b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
106 4. a bit worse
351 5. much worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20926 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1429:pc16] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1429:pc16] is (1);
partial interview
v1434 pc17.learning new things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1434
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc17. (compared with two years ago, how is [q683-r first name] at:)
learning new things in general? (has this improved, not much changed, or
gotten worse?)
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
26 1. improved
787 2. not much changed
469 3. gotten worse
15 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1435 pc17a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1435
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc17a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
14 1. much improved
12 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21358 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1434:pc17] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1434:pc17] is (3);
partial interview
v1436 pc17b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1436
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc17b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
148 4. a bit worse
320 5. much worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20915 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1434:pc17] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1434:pc17] is (1);
partial interview
v1439 pc18.following story
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1439
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc18. (compared with two years ago, how is [q683-r first name] at:)
following a story in a book or on tv? (has this improved, not much changed,
or gotten worse?)
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
36 1. improved
858 2. not much changed
392 3. gotten worse
4 4. does not apply; r doesn't do activity
7 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1440 pc18a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1440
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc18a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
14 1. much improved
22 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21348 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1439:pc18] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1439:pc18] is (3);
partial interview
v1441 pc18b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1441
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc18b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
129 4. a bit worse
262 5. much worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20992 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1439:pc18] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1439:pc18] is (1);
partial interview
v1444 pc19.making decisions
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1444
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc19. (compared with two years ago, how is [q683-r first name] at:) making
decisions on everyday matters? (has this improved, not much changed, or
gotten worse?)
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
26 1. improved
807 2. not much changed
455 3. gotten worse
3 4. does not apply; r doesn't do activity
7 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1445 pc19a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1445
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc19a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
14 1. much improved
12 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21358 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1444:pc19] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1444:pc19] is (3);
partial interview
v1446 pc19b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1446
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc19b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
143 4. a bit worse
311 5. much worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20929 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1444:pc19] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1444:pc19] is (1);
partial interview
v1448 pc20.handling shop money
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1448
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc20. (compared with two years ago, how is [q683-r first name] at:)
handling money for shopping? (has this improved, not much changed, or gotten
worse?)
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
27 1. improved
831 2. not much changed
394 3. gotten worse
35 4. does not apply; r doesn't do activity
10 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1449 pc20a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1449
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc20a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
13 1. much improved
14 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21357 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1448:pc20] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1448:pc20] is (3);
partial interview
v1450 pc20b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1450
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc20b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
80 4. a bit worse
313 5. much worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20990 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1448:pc20] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1448:pc20] is (1);
partial interview
v1451 pc21.handling finances
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1451
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc21. (compared with two years ago, how is [q683-r first name] at:)
handling financial matters, that is, the pension or dealing with the bank?
(has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
13 1. improved
826 2. not much changed
421 3. gotten worse
22 4. does not apply; r doesn't do activity
14 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1452 pc21a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1452
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc21a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
8 1. much improved
5 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21371 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1451:pc21] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1451:pc21] is (3);
partial interview
v1453 pc21b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1453
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc21b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
85 4. a bit worse
334 5. much worse
2 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20963 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1451:pc21] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1451:pc21] is (1);
partial interview
v1454 pc22.arithmetic problems
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1454
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc22. (compared with two years ago, how is [q683-r first name] at:)
handling other everyday arithmetic problems, such as, knowing how much food
to buy, knowing how long between visits from family or friends? (has
this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
19 1. improved
856 2. not much changed
408 3. gotten worse
3 4. does not apply; r doesn't do activity
11 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1455 pc22a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1455
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc22a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
8 1. much improved
11 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21365 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1454:pc22] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1454:pc22] is (3);
partial interview
v1456 pc22b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1456
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc22b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
79 4. a bit worse
328 5. much worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20976 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1454:pc22] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1454:pc22] is (1);
partial interview
v1457 pc23.reasoning
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1457
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc23. (compared with two years ago, how is [q683-r first name] at:) using
(his/her) intelligence to understand what's going on and to reason things
through? (has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
27 1. improved
848 2. not much changed
418 3. gotten worse
4 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1458 pc23a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1458
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc23a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
13 1. much improved
14 2. a bit improved
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
21357 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1457:pc23] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1457:pc23] is (3);
partial interview
v1459 pc23b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1459
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc23b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
145 4. a bit worse
272 5. much worse
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20966 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); [q1457:pc23] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1457:pc23] is (1);
partial interview
v1461 pc24.lost
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1461
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc24. now, thinking about some current behaviors, does (he/she) ever get
lost in a familiar environment?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
307 1. yes
973 5. no
18 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1462 pc25.wander
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1462
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc25. does (he/she) ever wander off and not return by (himself/herself)?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
98 1. yes
4. r cannot wander off
1193 5. no
7 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1463 pc26.left alone
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1463
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc26. can (he/she) be left alone for an hour or so?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
1025 1. yes
272 5. no
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1464 pc27.hallucinate
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1464
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc27. does (he/she) ever see or hear things that are not really there?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
222 1. yes
1060 5. no
15 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1465 pc28.angry
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1465
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc28. during the past week, how often has (he/she) shown any of the
following behaviors:
(during the past week) how often has (he/she) become angry or
hostile without reason? was it most of the time, some of the time, or
never?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
41 1. most of time
332 2. some of time
904 3. never
21 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1466 pc29.sleep
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1466
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc29. (during the past week)
how often has (he/she) had difficulties falling asleep or waking
frequently during the night?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
186 1. most of time
362 2. some of time
692 3. never
58 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20086 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1467 pc30.dangerous
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1467
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc30. (during the past week)
how often has (he/she) done things that are dangerous to
(himself/herself) or others?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
19 1. most of time
112 2. some of time
1150 3. never
16 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20087 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1468 pc31.rocking
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1468
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc31. (during the past week)
how often has (he/she) paced around or made unexplained rocking
movements while sitting?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
44 1. most of time
88 2. some of time
1151 3. never
14 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20087 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1469 pc32.plotting
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1469
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc32. (during the past week)
how often has (he/she) mentioned that people are plotting against or
trying to harm (him/her)?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
38 1. most of time
94 2. some of time
1154 3. never
10 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
20087 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
v1470 pc33.alcohol
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1470
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc33. (during the past week)
how often has (he/she) drunk too much alcohol?
user note: this question was jumped based on ([q1014:r_s cur age (ref
q753)] is (lt 65) before version 3. see f454a and f6697a for product version
information.
................................................................................
9 1. most of time
26 2. some of time
1253 3. never
9 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
20087 blank. inap (inapplicable): [q456:cs continue] is (5); [q497:cs2b] is
(a) or [q542:cs15c2] is (a) or [q518:cs11a] is (a);
[q483:cs1a] is (1); [q1014:r_s cur age] is (gt 0 and lt 65) or
([q1014:r_s cur age] is (0) and [q461:preload cohort] is (3-
4)); partial interview
version data release version
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q20001
type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
................................................................................
1. version 1, december 2001
21384 2. version 2, may 2003