section pc: proxy cognition (respondent)
==========================================================================================
1996 hrs [wave 3] core (final release)
odbc reference: [xml1996n]
perl script: codebkd9.pl v5.04 mon sep 15 16:04:45 edt 2003
note to users: the program that generated this codebook is under development.
if you have any questions or suggestions concerning codebook layout or content
please bring them to the attention of the hrs staff at hrsquest@isr.umich.edu.
printing recommendation: set margins (left/right/top/bottom) to .5"; print in
portrait orientation using a mono-space 10-point font.
==========================================================================================
hhid household identifier
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9000
type: character width: 6 decimals: 0
................................................................................
10964 000002-099564. household identifier range
pn person number
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9021
type: character width: 3 decimals: 0
user note: the range 10-49 is reserved for respondent person numbers.
respondent person numbers ending in 0 are generally from the original
sample; respondent person numbers ending in 1 are generally new spouses
added since the original sample.
................................................................................
5431 010. person number
121 011. person number
3005 020. person number
11 021. person number
1012 030. person number
2 031. person number
1382 040. person number
subhh 1996 sub-household identifier
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9005
type: character width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
10638 0. original sample household - no split from divorce or
separation of spouses or partners
189 1. split household - one half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
135 2. split household - other half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
2 5. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
6. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
7. reunited household - respondents from split household reunite
csubhh 1994 sub-household identifier
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9003
type: character width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
10793 0. original sample household - no split from divorce or
separation of spouses or partners
91 1. split household - one half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
80 2. split household - other half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
5. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
6. split household - one half of couple from subhh 1 or 2
7. reunited household - respondents from split household reunite
pn_sp 1996 spouse/partner person number
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9031
type: character width: 3 decimals: 0
user note: the range 10-49 is reserved for respondent person numbers.
respondent person numbers ending in 0 are generally from the original
sample; respondent person numbers ending in 1 are generally new spouses
added since the original sample.
................................................................................
3229 010. person number
112 011. person number
2774 020. person number
10 021. person number
909 030. person number
2 031. person number
1260 040. person number
2668 blank. inap (inapplicable) - no spouse interview
csr 1996 whether coversheet respondent
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9061
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
6700 1. yes
116 2. yes - household had two coversheet respondents and the
coversheet information given by this respondent has been
retained.
4032 5. no
116 6. no - household had two coversheet respondents and the
coversheet information given by this respondent has not been
retained.
famr 1996 whether family respondent
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9062
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
6750 1. yes
11 2. yes - household had two family respondents and the family
information given by this respondent has been retained.
4192 5. no
11 6. no - household had two family respondents and the family
information given by this respondent has not been retained.
finr 1996 whether financial respondent
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9063
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
6745 1. yes
11 2. yes - household had two financial respondents and the
financial information given by this respondent has been
retained.
4197 5. no
11 6. no - household had two financial respondents and the financial
information given by this respondent has not been retained.
qnr 1996 questionnaire
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9070
type: character width: 5 decimals: 0
user note: range is not continuous because some questionnaires were
invalid.
................................................................................
10964 00001-10970. questionnaire number range
v1056 pc1.rate memory
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1056
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc1. part of this study is concerned with people's memory, and ability to
think about things. first, how would you rate [q371-r first name]'s memory
at the present time? would you say it is excellent, very good, good, fair or
poor?
................................................................................
135 1. excellent
214 2. very good
228 3. good
113 4. fair
46 5. poor
7. other
2 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1061 pc3.rate judgment
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1061
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc3. how would you rate [q371-r first name] in making judgements and
decisions? would you say (he/she) is excellent, very good, good, fair, or
poor?
................................................................................
182 1. excellent
231 2. very good
199 3. good
75 4. fair
50 5. poor
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1066 pc5.rate organize
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1066
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc5. how would you rate [q371-r first name]'s ability to organize (his/her)
daily activities? (would you say (he/she) is excellent, very good, good,
fair, or poor?)
................................................................................
202 1. excellent
204 2. very good
211 3. good
59 4. fair
61 5. poor
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1071 pc7.jorm introduction
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1071
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc7. now we want you to remember what [q371-r first name] was like two
years ago and to compare it with what (he/she) is like now. two years ago
was in (fill:1985/1986). i will read situations where [q371-r first name]
has to use (his/her) memory or intelligence and we would like you to
indicate whether this has improved, stayed the same, or gotten worse in
that situation over the past two years. note the importance of comparing
(his/her) present performance with two years ago. so if two years ago
[q371-r first name] always forgot where (he/she) had left things, and
(he/she) still does, then this would be considered "not much change".
user note: this preamble variable has been included in this data set in
order to document questionnaire flow; all data values are blanks.
................................................................................
10964 blank. no data
v1072 pc8.things: birthdays-occupations
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1072
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc8. compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:
remembering things about family and friends, such as occupations, birthdays,
and addresses. has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?
................................................................................
22 1. improved
655 2. not much changed
57 3. gotten worse
7. other
3 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1073 pc8a.improved things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1073
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc8a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
11 1. much improved
11 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10942 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1072:pc8] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1072:pc8] is (3); partial
interview
v1074 pc8b.worse things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1074
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc8b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
34 4. a bit worse
23 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10907 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1072:pc8] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1072:pc8] is (1); partial
interview
v1077 pc9.things: recent
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1077
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc9. compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:
remembering things that have happened recently? (has this improved, not much
changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
26 1. improved
642 2. not much changed
66 3. gotten worse
7. other
3 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1078 pc9a.improved things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1078
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc9a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
13 1. much improved
13 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10938 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1077:pc9] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1077:pc9] is (3); partial
interview
v1079 pc9b.worse things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1079
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc9b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
44 4. a bit worse
22 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10898 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1077:pc9] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1077:pc9] is (1); partial
interview
v1082 pc10.conversations: recall
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1082
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc10. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:)
recalling conversations a few days later? (has this improved, not much
changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
26 1. improved
626 2. not much changed
82 3. gotten worse
7. other
3 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1083 pc10a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1083
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc10a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
10 1. much improved
16 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10938 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1082:pc10] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1082:pc10] is (3); partial
interview
v1084 pc10b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1084
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc10b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
58 4. a bit worse
24 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10882 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1082:pc10] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1082:pc10] is (1); partial
interview
v1087 pc11.rememberng: own phone
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1087
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc11. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:)
remembering (his/her) address and telephone number? (has this improved, not
much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
19 1. improved
680 2. not much changed
33 3. gotten worse
7. other
5 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1088 pc11a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1088
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc11a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
9 1. much improved
10 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10945 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1087:pc11] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1087:pc11] is (3); partial
interview
v1089 pc11b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1089
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc11b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
16 4. a bit worse
17 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10931 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1087:pc11] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1087:pc11] is (1); partial
interview
v1092 pc12.rememberng: day-month
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1092
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc12. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:)
remembering what day and month it is? (has this improved, not much changed,
or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
14 1. improved
668 2. not much changed
51 3. gotten worse
7. other
4 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1093 pc12a.improved things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1093
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc12a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
9 1. much improved
5 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10950 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1092:pc12] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1092:pc12] is (3); partial
interview
v1094 pc12b.worse things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1094
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc12b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
28 4. a bit worse
23 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10913 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1092:pc12] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1092:pc12] is (1); partial
interview
v1097 pc13.rememberng: usual kept
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1097
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc13. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:)
remembering where things are usually kept? (has this improved, not much
changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
14 1. improved
654 2. not much changed
67 3. gotten worse
7. other
2 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1098 pc13a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1098
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc13a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
10 1. much improved
4 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10950 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1097:pc13] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1097:pc13] is (3); partial
interview
v1099 pc13b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1099
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc13b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
43 4. a bit worse
24 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10897 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1097:pc13] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1097:pc13] is (1); partial
interview
v1102 pc14.rememberng: different place
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1102
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc14. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:)
remembering where to find things which have been put in a different place
than usual? (has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
13 1. improved
617 2. not much changed
101 3. gotten worse
1 4. don't do
7. other
5 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1103 pc14a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1103
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc14a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
8 1. much improved
5 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10951 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1102:pc14] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1102:pc14] is (3); partial
interview
v1104 pc14b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1104
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc14b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
73 4. a bit worse
28 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10863 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1102:pc14] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1102:pc14] is (1); partial
interview
v1107 pc15.working usual machines
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1107
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc15. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:) knowing
how to work familiar machines around the house? (has this improved, not much
changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
28 1. improved
669 2. not much changed
35 3. gotten worse
1 4. don�t do
7. other
3 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1108 pc15a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1108
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc15a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
14 1. much improved
14 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10936 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1107:pc15] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1107:pc15] is (3); partial
interview
v1109 pc15b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1109
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc15b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
14 4. a bit worse
21 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10929 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1107:pc15] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1107:pc15] is (1); partial
interview
v1112 pc16.learning new machines
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1112
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc16. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:)
learning to use a new gadget or machine around the house? (has this
improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
33 1. improved
644 2. not much changed
52 3. gotten worse
3 4. don�t do
7. other
4 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1113 pc16a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1113
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc16a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
16 1. much improved
17 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10931 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1112:pc16] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1112:pc16] is (3); partial
interview
v1114 pc16b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1114
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc16b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
23 4. a bit worse
29 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10912 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1112:pc16] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1112:pc16] is (1); partial
interview
v1117 pc17.learning new things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1117
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc17. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:)
learning new things in general? (has this improved, not much changed, or
gotten worse?)
................................................................................
44 1. improved
629 2. not much changed
59 3. gotten worse
1 4. don�t do
7. other
3 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1118 pc17a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1118
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc17a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
14 1. much improved
30 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10920 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1117:pc17] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1117:pc17] is (3); partial
interview
v1119 pc17b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1119
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc17b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
32 4. a bit worse
27 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10905 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1117:pc17] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1117:pc17] is (1); partial
interview
v1122 pc18.following story
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1122
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc18. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:)
following a story in a book or on tv? (has this improved, not much changed,
or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
27 1. improved
660 2. not much changed
44 3. gotten worse
3 4. don�t do
7. other
3 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1123 pc18a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1123
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc18a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
13 1. much improved
14 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10937 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1122:pc18] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1122:pc18] is (3); partial
interview
v1124 pc18b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1124
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc18b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
25 4. a bit worse
19 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10920 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1122:pc18] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1122:pc18] is (1); partial
interview
v1127 pc19.making decisions
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1127
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc19. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:) making
decisions on everyday matters? (has this improved, not much changed, or
gotten worse?)
................................................................................
24 1. improved
649 2. not much changed
60 3. gotten worse
7. other
3 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1128 pc19a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1128
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc19a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
13 1. much improved
11 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10940 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1127:pc19] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1127:pc19] is (3); partial
interview
v1129 pc19b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1129
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc19b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
30 4. a bit worse
30 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10904 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1127:pc19] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1127:pc19] is (1); partial
interview
v1132 pc20.handling shop money
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1132
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc20. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:)
handling money for shopping? (has this improved, not much changed, or gotten
worse?)
................................................................................
34 1. improved
648 2. not much changed
47 3. gotten worse
3 4. don�t do
7. other
4 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1133 pc20a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1133
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc20a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
20 1. much improved
14 2. a bit improved
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10929 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1132:pc20] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1132:pc20] is (3); partial
interview
v1134 pc20b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1134
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc20b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
9 4. a bit worse
38 5. much worse
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10916 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1132:pc20] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1132:pc20] is (1); partial
interview
v1135 pc21.handling finances
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1135
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc21. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:)
handling financial matters, that is, the pension or dealing with the bank?
(has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
39 1. improved
638 2. not much changed
49 3. gotten worse
4 4. don�t do
7. other
5 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
3 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1136 pc21a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1136
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc21a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
21 1. much improved
18 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10925 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1135:pc21] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1135:pc21] is (3); partial
interview
v1137 pc21b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1137
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc21b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
17 4. a bit worse
32 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10915 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1135:pc21] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1135:pc21] is (1); partial
interview
v1138 pc22.arithmatic problems
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1138
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc22. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:)
handling other everyday arithmetic problems, such as, knowing how much food
to buy, knowing how long between visits from family or friends? (has this
improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
27 1. improved
660 2. not much changed
44 3. gotten worse
1 4. don�t do
7. other
3 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
3 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1139 pc22a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1139
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc22a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
14 1. much improved
13 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10937 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1138:pc22] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1138:pc22] is (3); partial
interview
v1140 pc22b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1140
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc22b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
14 4. a bit worse
30 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10920 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1138:pc22] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1138:pc22] is (1); partial
interview
v1141 pc23.reasoning
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1141
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc23. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:) using
(his/her) intelligence to understand what's going on and to reason things
through? (has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
37 1. improved
644 2. not much changed
52 3. gotten worse
7. other
3 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1142 pc23a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1142
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc23a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
17 1. much improved
20 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10927 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1141:pc23] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1141:pc23] is (3); partial
interview
v1143 pc23b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1143
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc23b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
26 4. a bit worse
26 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10912 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
[q1141:pc23] is (2 or dk or rf); [q1141:pc23] is (1); partial
interview
v1144 pc24.lost
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1144
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc24. now, thinking about some current behaviors, does [q98-prev wave proxy
name] ever get lost in a familiar environment?
................................................................................
41 1. yes
695 5. no
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1145 pc25.wander
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1145
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc25. does (he/she) ever wander off and not return by (himself/herself)?
................................................................................
10 1. yes
726 5. no
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1146 pc26.left alone
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1146
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc26. can (he/she) be left alone for an hour or so?
................................................................................
638 1. yes
100 5. no
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1147 pc27.hallucinate
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1147
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc27. does [q98-prev wave proxy name] ever see or hear things that are not
really there?
................................................................................
29 1. yes
706 5. no
7. other
2 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1148 pc28.angry
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1148
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc28. during the past week, how often has [q98-prev wave proxy name] shown
any of the following behaviors: (during the past week) how often has
(he/she) become angry or hostile without reason? was it most of the time,
some of the time, or never?
................................................................................
23 1. most of time
132 2. some of time
575 3. never
7. other
7 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1149 pc29.sleep
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1149
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc29. (during the past week) how often has (he/she) had difficulties falling
asleep or waking frequently during the night?
................................................................................
72 1. most of time
191 2. some of time
462 3. never
7. other
12 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1150 pc30.dangerous
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1150
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc30. (during the past week) how often has (he/she) done things that are
dangerous to (himself/herself) or others?
................................................................................
5 1. most of time
34 2. some of time
693 3. never
7. other
5 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1151 pc31.rocking
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1151
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc31. (during the past week) how often has (he/she) paced around or made
unexplained rocking movements while sitting?
................................................................................
11 1. most of time
20 2. some of time
701 3. never
7. other
5 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1152 pc32.plotting
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1152
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc32. (during the past week) how often has (he/she) mentioned that people
are plotting against or trying to harm (she/him)?
................................................................................
9 1. most of time
21 2. some of time
702 3. never
7. other
5 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
v1153 pc33.alcohol
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1153
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc33. (during the past week) how often has (he/she) drunk too much alcohol?
................................................................................
24 1. most of time
33 2. some of time
677 3. never
7. other
4 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
10226 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q558:cs50] is (1); [q218:cs1a] is (1);
partial interview
version data release version
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q20001
type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
................................................................................
1. version 1, march 1999
2. version 2, december 2000
3. version 3, may 2001
10964 4. version 4, september 2003