section pc: proxy cognition (respondent)
==========================================================================================
1995 ahead core (final release)
odbc reference: [a1995c]
perl script: codebkd9.pl v5.04 tue may 14 17:52:20 2002
note to users: the program that generated this codebook is under development.
if you have any questions or suggestions concerning codebook layout or content
please bring them to the attention of the hrs staff at hrsquest@isr.umich.edu.
printing recommendation: set margins (left/right/top/bottom) to .5"; print in
portrait orientation using a mono-space 10-point font.
==========================================================================================
hhid household identifier
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9000
type: character width: 6 decimals: 0
................................................................................
7027 200001-208898. household identifier range
pn person number
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9021
type: character width: 3 decimals: 0
user note: the range 10-49 is reserved for respondent person numbers.
respondent person numbers ending in 0 are generally from the original
sample; respondent person numbers ending in 1 are generally new spouses
added since the original sample.
................................................................................
4930 010. person number
13 011. person number
012. person number
2083 020. person number
1 021. person number
030. person number
031. person number
032. person number
040. person number
041. person number
subhh 1995 sub-household identifier
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9004
type: character width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
7016 0. original sample household - no split from divorce or
separation of spouses or partners
6 1. split household - one half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
5 2. split household - other half of couple from subhh 0 and new
spouse or partner, if any
blank. new cohort - dsubhh does not exist
bsubhh 1993 sub-household identifier
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9002
type: character width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
7027 0. original sample household - no split from divorce or
separation of spouses or partners
blank. new cohort - bsubhh does not exist
pn_sp 1995 spouse/partner person number
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9031
type: character width: 3 decimals: 0
user note: the range 10-49 is reserved for respondent person numbers.
respondent person numbers ending in 0 are generally from the original
sample; respondent person numbers ending in 1 are generally new spouses
added since the original sample.
................................................................................
1804 010. person number
13 011. person number
012. person number
1792 020. person number
1 021. person number
030. person number
031. person number
032. person number
040. person number
041. person number
3417 blank. inap (inapplicable) - no spouse interview
csr 1995 whether coversheet respondent
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9061
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
5108 1. yes
101 2. yes - household had two coversheet respondents and the
coversheet information given by this respondent has been
retained.
1717 5. no
101 6. no - household had two coversheet respondents and the
coversheet information given by this respondent has not been
retained.
famr 1995 whether family respondent
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9062
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
5174 1. yes
30 2. yes - household had two family respondents and the family
information given by this respondent has been retained.
3. yes - household had two family respondents for some sections
and the family information given by this respondent has been
retained.
1 4. no - household had no family respondents but the person number
of this respondent appears as the dpn_fam in the household
record.
1791 5. no
30 6. no - household had two family respondents and the family
information given by this respondent has not been retained.
7. no - household had two family respondents for some sections
and the family information given by this respondent has not
been retained.
1 8. no - household had no family respondents and the person number
of this respondent appears as the dpn_nfam in the household
record.
finr 1995 whether financial respondent
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9063
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
................................................................................
5191 1. yes
8 2. yes - household had two financial respondents and the
financial information given by this respondent has been
retained.
3. yes - household had two financial respondents for some
sections and the financial information given by this
respondent has been retained.
2 4. no - household had no financial respondents but the person
number of this respondent appears as the dpn_fin in the
household record.
1816 5. no
8 6. no - household had two financial respondents and the financial
information given by this respondent has not been retained.
7. no - household had two financial respondents for some sections
and the financial information given by this respondent has not
been retained.
2 8. no - household had no financial respondents and the person
number of this respondent appears as the dpn_nfin in the
household record.
qnr 1995 questionnaire
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q9070
type: character width: 5 decimals: 0
user note: range is not continuous because some questionnaires were
invalid.
................................................................................
7027 00001-07807. questionnaire number range
v1056 pc1.rate memory
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1056
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc1. part of this study is concerned with people's memory, and ability to
think about things. first, how would you rate [q371-r first name]'s memory
at the present time? would you say it is excellent, very good, good, fair or
poor?
user note: d218 'cs1a. proxy/self interview' (found in the cover screen
section) indicates if section pc is answered by a spouse proxy or non-spouse
proxy.
................................................................................
74 1. excellent
123 2. very good
206 3. good
204 4. fair
291 5. poor
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1061 pc3.rate judgment
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1061
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc3. how would you rate [q371-r first name] in making judgments and
decisions? would you say (he/she) is excellent, very good, good, fair, or
poor?
................................................................................
52 1. excellent
124 2. very good
214 3. good
188 4. fair
322 5. poor
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1066 pc5.rate organize
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1066
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc5. how would you rate [q371-r first name]'s ability to organize (his/her)
daily activities? (would you say (he/she) is excellent, very good, good,
fair, or poor?)
................................................................................
45 1. excellent
120 2. very good
237 3. good
160 4. fair
338 5. poor
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1071 pc7.jorm introduction
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1071
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc7. now we want you to remember what [q371-r first name] was like two years
ago and to compare it with what (he/she) is like now. two years ago was in
(fill:1985/1986). i will read situations where [q371-r first name] has to
use (his/her) memory or intelligence and we would like you to indicate
whether this has improved, stayed the same, or gotten worse in that
situation over the past two years. note the importance of comparing
(his/her) present performance with two years ago . so if two years ago
[q371-r first name] always forgot where (he/she) had left things, and
(he/she) still does, then this would be considered "not much change".
user note: this preamble variable has been included in this data set in
order to document questionnaire flow; all data values are blanks.
................................................................................
7027 blank. no data
v1072 pc8.things: birthdays-occupations
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1072
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc8. compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at: remembering
things about family and friends, such as occupations, birthdays, and
addresses. has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?
................................................................................
19 1. improved
545 2. not much changed
337 3. gotten worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1073 pc8a.improved things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1073
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc8a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
6 1. much improved
13 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
7008 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1072:pc8] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1072:pc8] is (3); partial interview
v1074 pc8b.worse things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1074
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc8b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
112 4. a bit worse
225 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6690 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1072:pc8] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1072:pc8] is (1); partial interview
v1077 pc9.things: recent
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1077
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc9. compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at: remembering
things that have happened recently? (has this improved, not much changed, or
gotten worse?)
................................................................................
11 1. improved
497 2. not much changed
392 3. gotten worse
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1078 pc9a.improved things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1078
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc9a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
6 1. much improved
5 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
7016 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1077:pc9] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1077:pc9] is (3); partial interview
v1079 pc9b.worse things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1079
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc9b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
145 4. a bit worse
246 5. much worse
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6635 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1077:pc9] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1077:pc9] is (1); partial interview
v1082 pc10.conversations: recall
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1082
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc10. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:)
recalling conversations a few days later? (has this improved, not much
changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
12 1. improved
491 2. not much changed
397 3. gotten worse
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1083 pc10a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1083
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc10a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
6 1. much improved
6 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
7015 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1082:pc10] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1082:pc10] is (3); partial interview
v1084 pc10b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1084
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc10b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
144 4. a bit worse
253 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6630 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1082:pc10] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1082:pc10] is (1); partial interview
v1087 pc11.rememberng: own phone
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1087
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc11. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:)
remembering (his/her) address and telephone number? (has this improved, not
much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
9 1. improved
604 2. not much changed
284 3. gotten worse
7. other
4 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1088 pc11a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1088
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc11a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
4 1. much improved
5 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
7018 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1087:pc11] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1087:pc11] is (3); partial interview
v1089 pc11b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1089
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc11b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
76 4. a bit worse
208 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6743 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1087:pc11] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1087:pc11] is (1); partial interview
v1092 pc12.rememberng: day-month
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1092
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc12. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:)
remembering what day and month it is? (has this improved, not much changed,
or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
6 1. improved
535 2. not much changed
360 3. gotten worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1093 pc12a.improved things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1093
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc12a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
5 1. much improved
1 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
7021 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1092:pc12] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1092:pc12] is (3); partial interview
v1094 pc12b.worse things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1094
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc12b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
98 4. a bit worse
262 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6667 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1092:pc12] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1092:pc12] is (1); partial interview
v1097 pc13.rememberng: usual kept
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1097
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc13. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:)
remembering where things are usually kept? (has this improved, not much
changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
9 1. improved
548 2. not much changed
343 3. gotten worse
1 4. r doesn't do this
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1098 pc13a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1098
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc13a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
5 1. much improved
4 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
7018 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1097:pc13] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1097:pc13] is (3); partial interview
v1099 pc13b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1099
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc13b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
111 4. a bit worse
232 5. much worse
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6683 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1097:pc13] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1097:pc13] is (1); partial interview
v1102 pc14.rememberng: different place
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1102
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc14. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:)
remembering where to find things which have been put in a different place
than usual? (has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
8 1. improved
487 2. not much changed
399 3. gotten worse
7. other
7 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1103 pc14a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1103
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc14a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
5 1. much improved
3 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
7019 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1102:pc14] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1102:pc14] is (3); partial interview
v1104 pc14b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1104
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc14b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
124 4. a bit worse
275 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6628 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1102:pc14] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1102:pc14] is (1); partial interview
v1107 pc15.working usual machines
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1107
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc15. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:) knowing
how to work familiar machines around the house? (has this improved, not much
changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
6 1. improved
567 2. not much changed
305 3. gotten worse
16 4. r doesn't do this
7. other
6 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1108 pc15a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1108
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc15a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
1. much improved
7 2. a bit improved
7. other
4 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
7016 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1107:pc15] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1107:pc15] is (3); partial interview
v1109 pc15b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1109
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc15b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
75 4. a bit worse
231 5. much worse
7. other
16 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6705 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1107:pc15] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1107:pc15] is (1); partial interview
v1112 pc16.learning new machines
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1112
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc16. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:) learning
to use a new gadget or machine around the house? (has this improved, not
much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
10 1. improved
489 2. not much changed
373 3. gotten worse
17 4. r doesn't do this
7. other
8 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
4 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1113 pc16a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1113
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc16a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
4 1. much improved
8 2. a bit improved
7. other
16 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6999 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1112:pc16] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1112:pc16] is (3); partial interview
v1114 pc16b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1114
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc16b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
98 4. a bit worse
277 5. much worse
7. other
16 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6636 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1112:pc16] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1112:pc16] is (1); partial interview
v1117 pc17.learning new things
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1117
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc17. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:) learning
new things in general? (has this improved, not much changed, or gotten
worse?)
................................................................................
15 1. improved
498 2. not much changed
376 3. gotten worse
7. other
10 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1118 pc17a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1118
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc17a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
5 1. much improved
10 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
7012 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1117:pc17] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1117:pc17] is (3); partial interview
v1119 pc17b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1119
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc17b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
111 4. a bit worse
265 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6651 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1117:pc17] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1117:pc17] is (1); partial interview
v1122 pc18.following story
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1122
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc18. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:)
following a story in a book or on tv? (has this improved, not much changed,
or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
14 1. improved
558 2. not much changed
321 3. gotten worse
7. other
7 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1123 pc18a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1123
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc18a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
6 1. much improved
8 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
7013 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1122:pc18] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1122:pc18] is (3); partial interview
v1124 pc18b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1124
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc18b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
85 4. a bit worse
235 5. much worse
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6706 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1122:pc18] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1122:pc18] is (1); partial interview
v1127 pc19.making decisions
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1127
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc19. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:) making
decisions on everyday matters? (has this improved, not much changed, or
gotten worse?)
................................................................................
14 1. improved
512 2. not much changed
371 3. gotten worse
3 4. r doesn't do this
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1128 pc19a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1128
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc19a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
4 1. much improved
10 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
7013 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1127:pc19] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1127:pc19] is (3); partial interview
v1129 pc19b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1129
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc19b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
98 4. a bit worse
273 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6656 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1127:pc19] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1127:pc19] is (1); partial interview
v1132 pc20.handling shop money
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1132
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc20. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:) handling
money for shopping? (has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
9 1. improved
525 2. not much changed
347 3. gotten worse
17 4. r doesn't do this
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1133 pc20a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1133
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc20a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
1 1. much improved
8 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
7018 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1132:pc20] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1132:pc20] is (3); partial interview
v1134 pc20b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1134
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc20b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
68 4. a bit worse
279 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6680 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1132:pc20] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1132:pc20] is (1); partial interview
v1135 pc21.handling finances
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1135
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc21. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:) handling
financial matters, that is, the pension or dealing with the bank? (has this
improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
7 1. improved
510 2. not much changed
364 3. gotten worse
16 4. r doesn't do this
7. other
2 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1136 pc21a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1136
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc21a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
3 1. much improved
4 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
7020 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1135:pc21] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1135:pc21] is (3); partial interview
v1137 pc21b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1137
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc21b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
61 4. a bit worse
303 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6663 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1135:pc21] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1135:pc21] is (1); partial interview
v1138 pc22.arithmatic problems
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1138
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc22. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:) handling
other everyday arithmetic problems, such as, knowing how much food to buy,
knowing how long between visits from family or friends? (has this improved,
not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
4 1. improved
550 2. not much changed
338 3. gotten worse
3 4. r doesn't do this
7. other
3 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
3 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1139 pc22a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1139
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc22a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
3 1. much improved
1 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
7023 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1138:pc22] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1138:pc22] is (3); partial interview
v1140 pc22b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1140
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc22b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
74 4. a bit worse
264 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6689 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1138:pc22] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1138:pc22] is (1); partial interview
v1141 pc23.reasoning
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1141
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc23. (compared with two years ago, how is [q371-r first name] at:) using
(his/her) intelligence to understand what's going on and to reason things
through? (has this improved, not much changed, or gotten worse?)
................................................................................
12 1. improved
546 2. not much changed
340 3. gotten worse
1 4. r doesn't do this
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1142 pc23a.improved
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1142
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc23a. is it much improved or a bit improved?
................................................................................
4 1. much improved
8 2. a bit improved
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
7015 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1141:pc23] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1141:pc23] is (3); partial interview
v1143 pc23b.worse
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1143
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc23b. is it much worse or a bit worse?
................................................................................
104 4. a bit worse
236 5. much worse
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
9. rf (refused)
6687 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); [q1141:pc23] is (2 or
dk or rf); [q1141:pc23] is (1); partial interview
v1144 pc24.lost
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1144
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc24. now, thinking about some current behaviors, does [q98-w1 proxy name]
ever get lost in a familiar environment?
................................................................................
235 1. yes
1 4. r doesn't do this
659 5. no
7. other
4 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1145 pc25.wander
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1145
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc25. does (he/she) ever wander off and not return by (himself/herself)?
................................................................................
66 1. yes
5 4. r doesn't do this
828 5. no
7. other
8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1146 pc26.left alone
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1146
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc26. can (he/she) be left alone for an hour or so?
................................................................................
681 1. yes
218 5. no
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1147 pc27.hallucinate
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1147
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc27. does [q98-w1 proxy name] ever see or hear things that are not really
there?
................................................................................
173 1. yes
1 4. r doesn't do this
719 5. no
7. other
7 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1148 pc28.angry
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1148
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc28. during the past week, how often has [q98-w1 proxy name] shown any of
the following behaviors: (during the past week) how often has (he/she)
become angry or hostile without reason? was it most of the time, some of the
time, or never?
................................................................................
47 1. most of time
217 2. some of time
632 3. never
1 4. r doesn't do this
7. other
3 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1149 pc29.sleep
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1149
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc29. (during the past week) how often has (he/she) had difficulties falling
asleep or waking frequently during the night?
................................................................................
143 1. most of time
266 2. some of time
467 3. never
7. other
24 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1150 pc30.dangerous
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1150
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc30. (during the past week) how often has (he/she) done things that are
dangerous to (himself/herself) or others?
................................................................................
13 1. most of time
92 2. some of time
788 3. never
7. other
7 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
1 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1151 pc31.rocking
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1151
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc31. (during the past week) how often has (he/she) paced around or made
unexplained rocking movements while sitting?
................................................................................
32 1. most of time
53 2. some of time
811 3. never
2 4. r doesn't do this
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1152 pc32.plotting
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1152
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc32. (during the past week) how often has (he/she) mentioned that people
are plotting against or trying to harm (.../...)?
................................................................................
22 1. most of time
75 2. some of time
800 3. never
7. other
2 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
v1153 pc33.alcohol
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q1153
type: numeric width: 1 decimals: 0
pc33. (during the past week) how often has (he/she) drunk too much alcohol?
................................................................................
5 1. most of time
12 2. some of time
881 3. never
7. other
1 8. dk (don't know); na (not ascertained)
2 9. rf (refused)
6126 blank. inap (inapplicable); [q218:cs1a] is (1); partial interview
version 1995 data release version
section: pc level: respondent cai reference: q20001
type: numeric width: 3 decimals: 0
................................................................................
1. version 1, december 1999
7027 2. version 2, may 2002